|
Copy & Paste your "To be or not to be" essay from googledrive here. Posts are due no later than 12-12 by 11:59 pm. You will create TWO replies to peers IN CLASS on 12-13, but if you do not finish, please be sure your replies are finished no later than Friday, 12-14 by 11:59 pm. MAKE SURE YOU'VE SHARED YOUR GOOGLEDRIVE ESSAY WITH MRS. ROHLFS AS WELL ([email protected]).
111 Comments
Cloee
12/12/2018 10:17:23 am
The infamous “To Be Or Not To Be” soliloquy from Shakespeare’s Hamlet has been continuously portrayed throughout the years with each time the play has been performed. Out of the various instances of when the play has been reenacted, the actor that played the best Hamlet was without a doubt Kenneth Branaugh from the 1990 version.
Reply
Lamont Aldridge
12/14/2018 06:10:55 pm
I really like how you drew attention to the weather of revenge and anger in your essay and your comparison of overall acting as well. This essay allowed me to look at things through a different lens and recognize different emotions other than confusion and sadness that he would be feeling in his circumstance. It would be frustrating to be caught in this situation and your essay defends this point strongly, great job!
Reply
Abby
12/12/2018 11:42:17 am
Two-way Face Off
Reply
Adrianne Rivera
12/13/2018 04:50:12 am
I also thought it interesting how the Branagh version emphasized the fact that Hamlet knew he was being watched, which I think made the moment more intense and highlighted the fact that Hamlet thirsts for revenge. I considered Hamlet's calm demeanor kinda creepy and it really set a tone of anticipation, holding your breath to see what Hamlet does next, which gives us insight into maybe how Claudius feels. Overall I like how you focused on the two way mirror, and the relationship between Hamlet and Claudius, and I agree that I liked how calm Branagh was performing this as it enhanced the controlling and knowledgeable character of Hamlet. My question is does this version of Hamlet focus more on his anger and revenge then it does the sturggle of death?
Reply
Sophie
12/13/2018 05:32:49 am
You brought up very good points when describing the actions of the Hamlet character. The way Claudius reacted when the rapier made a small tap on the mirror does make the audience interpret a threat, but what do you think the rapier pointed to his head mean? Could it mean the other side of the debate? The way you analyzed the two way mirror really shows something that is beyond what the original text says, thus enforcing the idea you brought up! You had lots of good points and enforced your opinion in distinct way.
Reply
Kayla Cuatt
12/12/2018 12:01:31 pm
Mel Gibson’s interpretation of the famous Hamlet soliloquy regards the speech as a desperate plea for answers, however as the soliloquy continues, Hamlet realizes the answers are found within himself and his own hesitation. Gibson accurately portrays the vacillation of Hamlet’s desires as they swing from a swift death to a vibrant life. The use of a dark, expressive setting and the absence of music or background noise expresses to the viewer just how alone and hopeless Hamlet truly feels.
Reply
Adrianne Rivera
12/13/2018 05:11:02 am
I agree that the setting of the Gibson version is perfect for the soliloquy, the symbolism powerfully shows Hamlet's indecision from kneeling by the crypts to gazing into the light streaming down from the ceiling. I also think that your analysis of Hamlet no longer desiring death is very interesting, that after gazing at the bones of the dead with their vacuous nature he thinks his own life as something of importance, as he is scared and worried about what lays beyond death. I thought that as he looked upon the crypts, Hamlet was reflecting on their lives and how they ended up and wondering what he will do differently from them? How will he live his life in such a way that even after dying he will be more than dust and maggot food? Your analysis really helped me consider aspects I looked over when writing mine!
Reply
Chloe Beutler
12/12/2018 12:35:30 pm
“To Be or Not to Be…” Soliloquy
Reply
Lauren Crossman
12/13/2018 05:00:06 am
Bringing in the theme of legacy made me think more about how Hamlet is concerned with his reputation. Not only does he feel the need to murder Claudius in revenge for murdering Hamlet's father, but he has to consider his personal reputation and his family's reputation. As the King and Queen are held to a high standard they strive to earn the respect of their people, however, if Hamlet murders Claudius it would tarnish their reputation as royalty and could cost them respect from the people.
Reply
Marissa Wood
12/14/2018 12:23:07 pm
I also believed that Mel Gibson's reenactment was the best one to express Hamlet's thoughts. The setting really is a powerful choice made by the director because it forces Hamlet to question life and death. I love how you talked about the cadence of his voice and how it changed from the beginning to the end and how it relates to his emotions. I didn't think about the light being goodness and Hamlet choosing it, but that is a very good point! Do you believe that maybe he was contemplating suicide and the light symbolizes him choosing to stay alive? Awesome analyze of the clip and overall really good essay!
Reply
Tarra Smith
12/12/2018 12:42:42 pm
Which performance had the best interpretation of “To be or not to be?” That is the question. While watching all five clips of this performance, I found that Clip Three, with Mel Gibson, from 1990, had the best interpretation of the soliloquy because this clip provided more dramatic emotions and body language from the performer, and a unique approach of Hamlet roaming in the family crypt, using different camera angles to enhance the effect.
Reply
Kayla Cuatt
12/13/2018 09:25:49 am
I also did Mel Gibson, so it's nice to see that other people noticed the same things I did. You have really good analysis and make good connections between Hamlet's emotions and his physical actions, as well as the visual reactions that the viewers can see. Do you think that Hamlet's erratic actions, shifting in speed and location with little to no warning, shows how erratic and unorganized his thoughts are? Or do you think that is simply Mel Gibson's style of acting? I think you did a really good job and I agree with your points! Your body paragraphs have good analysis and attention to detail. Great job!
Reply
Cloee Engel
12/13/2018 10:24:12 am
Although I did not pick this version as my favorite, it was a second best in my opinion. Your thoughts on this interpretation are thoughtful and dig deeper into maybe what the soliloquy didn't even show. When you pointed out the fact that there was a lot of emotion and that the scene being portrayed in the catacombs was an interesting twist, I agree with that. At first I thought it was kind of strange, but really did make this version stand out from the others, I also noted that he was fairly dramatic in his role as Hamlet. It was definitely one of the better interpretations.
Reply
Lauryn Moubray
12/12/2018 01:35:56 pm
The “to be or not to be” soliloquy made by Shakespeare is a statement by Hamlet that forces the reader to dive into the inner mechanisms of Hamlet’s thoughts. The clip starring Mel Gibson is the best representation possible for its palpable symbolism, dramatic setting, and unique body language. The purpose of having Hamlet pace through his family crypt is to highlight his vacillating thoughts; to kill himself or Claudius, the killer of his father.
Reply
Ashley Beck
12/13/2018 05:37:02 am
Reply
Ashley Beck
12/13/2018 05:38:06 am
Lauryn** I am so so sorry
Jayden Mann
12/12/2018 01:41:29 pm
There are many different interpretations of Hamlet’s “to be or not to be” speech. Many see the speech as a cry for help from Hamlet’s struggles, and many also see this speech as a threatening piece for his enemies. The portrayal of this speech done by Kenneth Branaugh in 1996 was, what I believe to be, the best interpretation of this soliloquy. Branaugh’s interpretation uses a very specific setting, a cogent cadence and body language, and memorable sounds of the scene.
Reply
Ashley Beck
12/13/2018 09:37:44 am
I agree with you that Kenneth Branagh’s reenactment was the best because of the his actions, tone, and body language. I really like how you mentioned the hinges as evidence for the two-way mirror, I never thought about that. I wonder if you think that Hamlet thought people were watching him in the original soliloquy.
Reply
Kollin Gonser
12/13/2018 09:39:20 am
I thought your interpretation and view of what the emptiness of the room portrayed his loss without his father and his loneliness was really interested and opened my eyes to a new view and deeper meaning behind the setting that I really did not even think of when watching this version. I agree with your point of Hamlet realizing his strength and sadness and sympathy, some may argue if he was pointing the dagger at himself or at the two behind the mirror, your evidence really shined a light on the perception that he is pointing his dagger at the two behind the mirror which he cannot see. I really enjoyed reading your essay good work :)
Reply
Kollin Gonser
12/12/2018 01:45:14 pm
Laurence Olivier’s 1948 version of Hamlet's “To Be or Not To Be soliloquy best represents the interpretation of the meaning behind this powerful and most famous soliloquy of Shakespeare's time through the actors body language and shifts in imagery/perspective.
Reply
Lauren Wietzke
12/13/2018 06:02:47 am
I thought it was really interesting how you suggested that his emotions almost made him numb and turned his body language into one that seems almost lifeless and weak. Although I chose the Kenneth Branagh version, I liked your explanation of the waves crashing and how that symbolized the uneasiness of his thoughts. I liked that you used the idea of being "trapped" for this rendition. I never really thought of Hamlet being trapped but now I can see how his thoughts interfere with his perception on life. If you think about it, Hamlet really has nobody to turn to. His mother doesn't want to listen to him, he can no longer see Ophelia, and his father was killed by his uncle who is now married to his mother...So therefore you can imagine how trapped he really feels, unable to turn to anyone. Really good essay :)
Reply
Jaedyn Viane
12/16/2018 08:24:01 am
I thought this was an interesting interpretation, not one many would have chosen! You made great points, especially that of this version not being what it seems right away. Some might first see it as Hamlet getting ready to jump into the sea, or take his life with the dagger, but you deeply analyzed the scene and brought new ideas forward. I really liked when you said that the waves symbolized Hamlet's hardships, and that he is having a conversation with himself, rather than anyone else. This version truly emphasized that Hamlet did feel trapped and lost on what to do.
Reply
Adriana Sanders
12/12/2018 02:59:39 pm
Hamlet’s “to be or not to be” soliloquy is arguably the most famous writing to come from Shakespeare’s works. Mel Gibson’s 1990 interpretation is brilliantly staged, utilizing the family crypt to symbolize life and death. Gibson’s intensity, juxtaposed with the darkness of the setting, awakens a newfound ferocity that other portrayals don’t capture.
Reply
Abigail l Leonard
12/13/2018 04:57:48 am
I agree that Mel Gibson did an amazing job performing the famous soliloquy. I thought your connection between Hamlet’s family crypt to aspects that are very prominent in Hamlet’s life at the time was a very good analysis of the clip. You have a pretty strong 2nd paragraph, as well as utilizing multiple vocab words. The fact that you analyze both the actor AND the setting/lighting is really appealing because the overall performance doesn’t solely focus on just the actor, but also their surroundings to add even more of the desired effect of the scene, so what I’m trying to say, is that you had some pretty rad analysis in your post. Overall, I really enjoyed your post, but I do think it could’ve use a little more specific evidence from the film to enhance your argument.
Reply
Hannah Hard
12/13/2018 05:17:55 am
I absolutely loved your introduction. The amazing diction is brought through the entire essay. The first paragraph is very well thought out, however I feel that it would be even more powerful with some textual evidence. Throughout the essay you have really good ideas, but I feel that they should be expanded a little bit. I thoroughly enjoyed when you brought in the aspect of the lighting, that was something I didn’t notice as much and it really brings light into your essay. My favorite part of your essay is when you talk about how Mel Gibson falls against the tomb, it really shows his despair. Your conclusion is good with the restates thesis, I just wish it was a tad longer.
Reply
Neva Clarke
12/13/2018 05:35:32 am
I love your intro, it tackles what you thought about the actors portrayal head on and does it with no fluffy and verbose words. I also love your use of vocab, it makes your point sound very sophisticated and makes your argument stronger. Your examples are very powerful in a sense that you get straight to the point and explain why and what your examples mean. With your examples, you connect the audience to the performer with the emotion that is conveyed which gives a more in depth meaning to Mel Gibson's portrayal for how the audience is drawn in. Your essay is very strong and to the point! You did a fantastic job. :D
Reply
Lauren Crossman
12/12/2018 03:20:28 pm
Drama, Revenge, and Cinema
Reply
Cloee Engel
12/13/2018 10:32:25 am
I thought Kenneth Branagh's version was one of the best interpretations too. I'm glad we agree on a lot of the same aspects such as the mirrors and the way he handled the knife in the scene. It definitely added to the intensity that he was already putting off. Personally, he held a lot more of the emotion I got from the play and it wasn't sad or overly dramatic. Your essay was really good!
Reply
Casey Klassen
12/12/2018 04:15:59 pm
Like so many writings, the author intentionally made specific elements of their story somewhat vague to allow the reader to interpret it in their own unique way. William Shakespeare implemented this element into Hamlet to allow the reader to interpret and it is eminent in Hamlet’s To Be or Not To Be soliloquy. Mel Gibson’s 1990 Hamlet interpretation is one of the many unique variations of Shakespearean literature that generates a different perspective of Hamlet and his state of mind. The setting in the family crypt and his vacillating inflection makes the Mel Gibson interpretation the best.
Reply
Lamont Aldridge
12/14/2018 06:17:06 pm
I love the connection you made to a tennis match! Also, I like that your main highlight is not only the setting but the madness that indecisiveness brings. Being put in a high risk and maddening situation can make lines blur and decisions difficult and you did a great job of describing his confusion and stress which I think gives character to who Hamlet is and shapes his choices in the text, great job!
Reply
Charlie Hazel
12/14/2018 07:57:11 pm
I also found Hamlet's interaction with the mummified bodies in the crypt setting amplifies his questioning of life as he confronts veritable death in his ancestral morgue. However, I do not think the sole intent of the soliloquy is suicidal, rather more of a reflection on his grief, and woes like you mentioned. This version does communicates the suicidal overtones clearly, but Gibson never pulls a dagger when speaking on the potency of a mere bodkin. This moment is literally and, in many interpretations, visually the height of Hamlet's dwelling on suicide, but he does not express the climax of his emotion by brandishing the weapon. Considering this conservative aspect of the suicidal portrayal, and Gibson's thoughtful progression through the crypt, I can agree that it is certainly a moving edition of the soliloquy
Reply
Riley Hancock
12/12/2018 04:18:56 pm
Reply
Marissa Wood
12/13/2018 11:05:17 am
This essay is really good! Awesome examination of Branagh's version of Hamlet. While reading your essay, I felt like I was watching the video all over again because you explained and went through everything very well. Although I thought Mel Gibson's performance was the best, I agree with what you said about Kenneth Branagh bringing to life a disturbed Hamlet and also the last sentence that it was an act that is hard to forget. I absolutely love the line where you say that with the right actor and right motions it can really push to create a more profound soliloquy. Do you think that there is a possibility that Hamlet is really talking to himself during this soliloquy and pointing the dagger towards himself or do you think Hamlet knew that Claudius and Polonius were there and was directing the dagger towards them in a threatening way?
Reply
Adrianne Rivera
12/12/2018 04:29:11 pm
Hamlet’s “to be or not to be” soliloquy from Shakespeare's Hamlet, is full of deep thoughts about the meaning of life, death, and the pain mortals face, for what reason Hamlet can’t understand. The Mel Gibson version is the best interpretation of Hamlet’s soliloquy, as it shows Hamlet’s distress and conflict clearly as read in the play by using an interesting scene-setting of the family crypt, alongside frustrated movement and facial expressions.
Reply
Jayden Mann
12/13/2018 11:10:56 am
I do agree that the way they positioned Mel Gibson's setting in the crypt was powerful. It really tops off the mood of his feelings of death and loneliness. I also like how you describe the movemdent as frustrating, and good use of vocab. Do you think that if his body language would have been different the interpretation of this soliloquy woul dnot have been as powerful? I ask because you made body language a large part of your analysis. I also ask if you feel like setting of this portrayal is the reason you picked this soliloquy? Overall I liked the points you made about why this was a good interpretation. This was a good analysis.
Reply
Alissa Brown
12/14/2018 06:46:12 pm
Adrianne, I wholeheartedly with you that the setting in this version was the most powerful. Being surrounded by the bones of his ancestors prompts Hamlet to consider what occurs after death and why people are afraid to die. I also like your analysis of the different symbolism that this interpretation uses to better portray Hamlet's mental state. Additionally, I like that you mentioned not only why you prefer this version, but also what it did to rise above the others. However, you say that Hamlet was not fixated on suicide, whereas many scholars believe that he is contemplating it in this soliloquy. What is your reasoning for thinking that? Do you believe that Hamlet was only focusing on the consequences of killing his uncle? Overall, amazing essay!
Reply
Jaedyn Viane
12/16/2018 08:10:11 am
I really like this essay, Adrianne! Not only did you express your opinion in a well-rounded statement, but you also deeply analyzed and explained why this version worked best for you. I liked the emphasis on your idea that in this version, Hamlet isn't considering his life or his uncles life, but how our actions control our life. That was a strong point in this essay that really brought everything together. Do you think if the film writers chose to make Hamlet weary of his own life that the tone of the scene would have been different?
Reply
Austin Morofsky
12/12/2018 05:43:06 pm
Shakespeare’s to be or not to be soliloquy is one of the most famous speeches of all time. It has been recited and referenced in countless works such as films and novels and has been cemented in pop culture so there are bound to be many unique takes and interpretations. Mel Gibson took on the role of Hamlet in the film Hamlet and arguably gave the best to be or not to be soliloquy of them all.
Reply
Alyssa Chestnut
12/13/2018 05:17:43 am
I really like this essay, especially because rather than listing only what the author did do successfully, you informed your audience that there were things he didn't do in comparison to the other soliloquy's, and that vacancy is what was successful for him. The sincerity of Hamlet's soliloquy is definitely a primary thing to note, and I agree, not having any music or dramatic suspense in scenery is effective to fully exemplify the soliloquy's message. Is there a way that Gibson could have incorporated something sentimental in his performance, or do you think by doing so it would take away from the overall persona Gibson was trying to convey? Is Hamlet more angry to you, or depressed?
Reply
Austin Morofsky
12/13/2018 05:33:31 am
I believe the biggest strength this interpretation has is its simplicity. There needs to be a fine balance between sentiment and emotion without taking away from Gibson's performance which is tough. One could argue that the setting was the sentiment in Gibson's portrayal; he is with a bunch of corpses after all. But it's not focused on or on the nose--Hamlet is just there debating with his conscience. I believe Hamlet has a more sad, conflicted persona with a hint of frustration but I also believe that he can be incredibly angry. Both anger and depression can drive a person into madness. It's so interesting to debate because there is no concrete answer, just interpretation.
Briana Holliday
12/13/2018 05:21:25 am
Your intro has a nice lead into your thesis, but your thesis needs a little more. For example, if you add "through his use of chilling tone of voice, body language that keeps your focus, and the location he chooses to recite it." after your final sentence to make it a full thesis. Again your 1st body paragraph has good a good idea of analysis, but I think you could add in another example at the end where you talk about him being alone. Maybe say, " As he stands alone in the catacombs, all we hear is his voice echoing through its chambers which reflect his inner discourses of these constant ideas all trying to escape his lips at once." Love your last sentence in the 2nd body paragraph, exquisite ideas! The sentence before it however is a bit confusing. Try rewording it to, " Gibson's version of the speech is one that most closely captures the manuscript version. His portrayal of Hamlet is set apart form the rest through his inquisitive charm that ensnares the viewers attention." DAAAAANNNNG!!! Love the conclusion as is!!! Way to end strong dude!!! Really nice job overall just make a few tweaks and it'll be polished up :)
Reply
Fernando Ramirez
12/12/2018 05:43:22 pm
To be or not to be, that is the question. A soliloquy that can transformed and melded to convey so many different feelings. A soliloquy that conveys the utter tribulations Hamlet is going through, it completely galvanizes the audience. This begs the question, which actor interprets the these famous lines the best? Through an intense cadence, cinematography and the use of a mirror Kenneth Branaugh exudes the utter agony and aggravation Hamlet is suffering through in choosing between the sweet release of death, or his duty of revenge.
Reply
Casey Klassen
12/13/2018 05:33:18 am
Well, done. I agree with every statement you made. You make a strong argument that could convince some of the most stubborn believers. Your points on cadence, cinematography, and the mirror and are solid and you thoroughly elaborate on them in great detail. I like the use of the block quote to implement a specific section of the soliloquy to refresh to readers of Shakespeare's intentions. In the cadence section I don’t see any cadence based supporting points, it appears that you implemented Hamlet’s inner thoughts and his internal struggle with death. If this was intentional I would suggest changing its name in the introduction. Overall, I liked everything you did. Your unique format fits perfectly with your points. All your points are accurate and relevant with their respective section. There are a few minor grammar, spelling and word placement errors that could be cleaned up with a proofread prior to submission but they don’t detract from the flow or persuasiveness too much. Again it is a great paper and a pleasure to read.
Reply
Mason
12/14/2018 10:15:22 am
Great essay!! I think the use of quotes from the speech, accompanied by your citations from the scene, serve to really solidify the idea of desperation and sadness that Hamlet conveys. Your views on the various symbols scattered throughout the scene are very close to mine but also provide new insight and interpretations of the soliloquy. Very nice job lord Fernando.
Reply
Lauren Pryor
12/12/2018 06:06:10 pm
Hamlet’s conscience hangs in the balance throughout the play. There is a direct struggle in the first line of the soliloquy–to be, or not to be. Hamlet is thinking about life and death and considering a state of being compared to a state of not being–being alive versus being dead.
Reply
The Fernando
12/13/2018 08:09:50 am
Quite thought provoking Ms Pryor. Your interpretation of Branagh interpretation of the soliloquy made me rethink my own interpretation of the scene. The idea that his reflection in the mirror is a fallacy is intriguing, almost emanating the sense that Hamlet is lying to himself. The idea that Hamlet is fully aware of his uncle daddy prompts the idea that instead of dramatic irony being placed on Hamlet, it is in actuality on Claudius. Overall great thought provoking essay.
Reply
Chloe Beutler
12/16/2018 08:21:34 am
Your connection to the struggle of power is intriguing. This is an important theme in the play of Hamlet. The analysis presented in this essay is thoroughly convincing. As I believed Mel Gibson's enactment of this soliloquy was the best, I now understand your reasoning for Branagh's portrayal. My favorite is your connection to the meaning of "conscience" and the reflection analyzed throughout!
Reply
Marissa Wood
12/12/2018 06:20:39 pm
Hamlet's "To be, or not to be" soliloquy is arguably the most famous soliloquy in the history of the theatre. The famous soliloquy is reflecting life and death. Hamlet is grieving for his father and is immensely overwhelmed by grief, betrayal, and the task that the ghost of the late King Hamlet is expecting from him. Mel Gibson’s 1990 version is the best interpretation of the soliloquy because of the dark setting placed in the crypt and because it focuses on death holistically.
Reply
Tarra Smith
12/13/2018 05:10:37 am
Maybe instead of saying “ the ghost of the late King Hamlet” you could just say that “the ghost of this father” to make the readers know that the relationship is more personal. Good job on giving a solid thesis. I agree with your thoughts that since this is where Hamlet will most likely be placed when he dies makes it more intense. It gives him a chance to more closely and personally reflect on what happens after death. Why do you think they chose to have this scene start with sad, breathy tone of voice, then elevate to a more aggressive attitude? Interesting observation that I agree with about Hamlet choosing the light over the darkness, essentially choosing life over death. Good conclusion, and I like the way you say “inner conflicts." It really captures that this is his own obstacle and story.
Reply
Lauryn Moubray
12/13/2018 11:03:47 am
You have a great essay! I totally agree with how you explain that his pacing symbolizes him taking his own life, but do you think it could also resemble him trying to decide if he has enough courage to stop thinking about killing his uncle and just do it? Also, you mention how the silence represents his thoughts, what do you think these thoughts are exactly? Overall you had a great essay with really well said thoughts about why it was the best clip!
Reply
Luke
12/12/2018 06:27:22 pm
Mel Gibson’s Hamlet
Reply
Adriana Sanders
12/13/2018 04:48:31 am
Great essay! I love how strong and in-depth your analysis is! I also agree that staging the scene in the family crypt is a cool and interesting choice, and Mel Gibson did a great job of reciting the famous soliloquy. We talked in class about if Hamlet was suicidal. Do you think the Mel Gibson version portrays it in this way? Or is it more about the idea of existing? Both of your body paragraphs are super solid and do a great job of telling what the filmmakers did, and why they made those choices. Overall, your essay has strong analysis and tells why Mel Gibson's version is the best! Good job!
Reply
Abigail l Leonard
12/13/2018 05:12:36 am
Although I didn’t write my post about Mel Gibson’s version, I do think that he portrayed Hamlet very well, and agree that he did an amazing job. I liked the very clear and simple thesis in your intro. The connection of going deeper into the tomb, which is symbolic to going deeper into despair, is a very strong argument point, nice job! I hadn’t thought of that before. At the end of the first body paragraph, I think you could add more details about some of the grief he has, or specific things he says to really cue the audience into what he’s meaning by what he says. I would suggest changing some of the sentences you start paragraphs with because you say, “Mel Gibson’s ‘To Be or Not To Be’“, to start three of your four paragraphs. I thought the idea of Hamlet asking his family about what he should do about his uncle, and about what happens after death was a cool analysis. Nice analysis.
Reply
Alyvia
12/12/2018 06:43:35 pm
What Is The Question?
Reply
Mason
12/13/2018 10:49:07 am
Amazing essay! You provided great points and analysis to support Branagh as being the best representation of the to be or not to be soliloquy. You use quite sophisticated diction and provide good examples of the many metaphors scattered throughout the scene, to further prove your point.
Reply
Mason (continued)
12/13/2018 10:56:56 am
Your use of quotes from the soliloquy incorporated with the scenes depiction of this line, serves to further the points that you make.
Kollin Gonser
12/13/2018 11:05:38 am
I really enjoyed your point of view along with your evidence about how intriguing it was for him to point the rapier at his reflection as a sense of self-loathing that he emits which is a point of view that I didn't think to think about but now that I read your essay I totally see where you are coming from in the sense that Hamlet did have self-loathing after his father died and his mom married his uncle. I agree with your statement on how the diction puts an emphasis on him questioning if killing himself is worth it or not and if life in general was worth it and your way that you explained how his emotions really were tearing him apart at the core. I really liked your essay keep up the good work :)
Reply
Lauren Wietzke
12/12/2018 06:45:33 pm
Though the question sounds simplistic, everything surrounding it is incredibly complex. What exactly is “the rub” and is it different upon every individual who is encountered with it? In Shakespeare's play, Hamlet, there is an abundance of ways one may understand and interpret his most famous soliloquy, “To be or not to be?” Some scholars believe that Hamlet is contemplating two extremes: life or death. Other scholars however, believe that he’s actually moved on from the stage of suicide, but rather he’s analyzing why people in general, refrain from committing suicide.Although some of us claim we are not afraid of death, there are still a considerable amount of people who fear the unknown, which is what some scholars believe is capturing the purpose of the entire soliloquy.
Reply
Hannah Hard
12/13/2018 02:01:43 pm
You did an awesome job on your essay. I really enjoyed when you talked about the echoing of Hamlet’s footsteps in the great room, it gives a sense that he is alone but Claudius and Polonius are there behind the mirror. I like how you talk about Hamlet’s emotion and bring into play both depression and anger. The Kenneth Branagh version definitely does a good job showing Hamlet’s emotion. I like that you give the idea of personification for the line “to die, to sleep”. I had never thought of it that way, and it makes so much more sense. The question remains on how to interpret Hamlet’s soliloquy. You did an amazing job analyzing!
Reply
Mason
12/12/2018 06:49:21 pm
Which soliloquy is the best? That is the question.
Reply
Lauren Wietzke
12/13/2018 05:17:03 am
You have a really strong essay! I agree with you that Kenneth Branaghs rendition was the best and you give clear evidence to prove how his loneliness and anger has created his own madness. When you mentioned Hamlet peering into the mirror at the reflection of himself, I would introduce the dramatic irony that Shakespeare is implementing here. I think giving the reader more background on the context of it being a two sided mirror would help connect the fact that, though Hamlet appears to be talking to his own reflection, he is also talking to two men whom he despises. Each body paragraph was easy to follow and every claim was backed up with evidence, proving that you actually understood Kenneth Branaghs interpretation of Hamlet's "To be or not to be" soliloquy.
Reply
The Fernando
12/13/2018 07:58:51 am
Insanity, the marks of a mad men, or a trait of intelligence. Mr Hamman, your analyses of Kenneth Branagh performance of the “To be or not to be” speech is admirable. Your determination of Hamlet's fall to madness is expertly backed with great evidence from the portrayal. While we as a society depict madness as a negative trait I leave you with a quote from Aristotle “ No great genius has ever existed without some touch of madness” Is this madness that you see emanating from Hamlet in all actuality in all of us, only encumbered by society's view of madness.
Reply
Ashley Beck
12/12/2018 06:59:29 pm
In Kenneth Branagh’s reenactment of Hamlet’s famous “To be or not to be” soliloquy, Branagh captures Shakespeare’s original message in his 1996 film reproduction of Hamlet. During this soliloquy, readers can infer that Hamlet analyzes his existence and also questions the outcome of murder and the consequences it would present. Shakespeare’s intended message amidst Hamlet’s personal conflict is distinctly portrayed through Branagh’s actions, hushed tone, and notably remarkable setting choice.
Reply
Lauren Pryor
12/14/2018 06:22:00 am
Your essay is very well written! I really liked the connection between the mirror and Hamlet's internal struggle. I loved how you tied in dramatic irony to the mirror scene. You mentioned how the dagger part could be directed towards Claudius, as if Hamlet knows he's there, do you think throughout the entire soliloquy Hamlet knew Claudius was listening/watching? Overall, great essay, Ashley.
Reply
Charlie Hazel
12/14/2018 05:43:56 pm
You've got some great points here, Ashley! I found that your use of direct quotations in your first paragraph strengthens and hones your argument about Branagh's actions; the quoted passage gives context to your analysis. You have another solid point about the use of dramatic irony with the two-way mirror setup and Hamlet's unsheathing his bodkin. I also felt that this version reserved the most intense acting for brandishing the dagger, which augments the audience's perception of the hatred. Seriously great point.
Reply
Briana Holliday
12/12/2018 07:24:14 pm
A serene scene set by the sea accompanied by a soothing iambic pentameter is in shocking contrast to what melancholy words are delivered by Laurence Olivier's rendition of Hamlet’s “To be or not to be” soliloquy. This shot shows strong uses of physically displayed emotions, mental weaknesses, and moral dilemmas.
Reply
Alexis Simpson
12/14/2018 11:18:45 am
I like how you said that he used his actions to integrate with the soliloquy itself, I have to agree that by doing so, his interpretation becomes quite clear. The reason I didn’t choose Olivier’s performance was because I actually found it quite dramatic. The production itself along with his actions, his reactions, it all seemed exaggerated. When you said that Olivier kept a level tone of voice that enthralls the listener, personally, it seemed like his level tone just lacked the emotion behind such a serious soliloquy. Yes, his actions show it, but the way he spoke lacked vulnerability. Although our opinions differ, I do have to say that your essay is well constructed! You definitely provided thoughtful arguments and I did enjoy reading about your perspective. Nice job, Bri!
Reply
Mathias Stoecker
12/12/2018 07:30:10 pm
Arguably one of the most adulated soliloquies from Shakespeare’s play Hamlet, Prince Hamlet’s “To be or not to be” soliloquy shows a character vacillating between two options—life or death. Mel Gibson’s 1990 performance of this soliloquy uses the setting of Hamlet’s family crypt as well as Gibson’s performance itself to show the audience that it is the best interpretation of the famous soliloquy.
Reply
Tarra Smith
12/13/2018 04:55:10 am
Really strong introduction, and good use of vocab to bring the attention grabber to the next level. Good job on having a clear, obvious thesis. Super interesting how you analyze how this scene is an actual representation of “to be or not to be.” I agree with your thoughts on the echo and how it essentially is his own decision that his dead ancestors can’t make for him. This is another level of thinking that really enhances your paper. I also agree that the way he’s staring off essentially shows that he is searching for answers. I never thought of it in that sense but it does make sense, and it sort of shows a sense that he’s lost in this own thoughts. Also, good use of quotes, and successful conclusion.
Reply
Lauren Anderson
12/13/2018 05:13:02 am
Your first body paragraph is amazing! I loved your idea that the dead are the "not to be", and that with the echoing scene, it enforces the fact that the choice was Hamlet's alone. Your analysis of Mel Gibson's portrayal is really well written and well laid out. At the very end of the video, Hamlet can just be seen bracing his hand on the wall after he finishes his speech, what are your thoughts on that? Do you think it was to steady himself, or from exhaustion, or form something else? I am curious what your thoughts are on that action.
Reply
Lauren Anderson
12/12/2018 07:34:38 pm
Hamlet’s most famous “to be or not to be” soliloquy occurs in a time of great conflict for the prince. His whole world has been turned upside-down: his father died, his mother married his uncle, who just so happens to be Hamlet’s father’s killer. During this particular scene, Hamlet contemplates suicide. The soliloquy is intense and profoundly emotional for Hamlet. There are thousands of different ways to portray this moving scene, in many cases the portrayed Hamlet was on the verge of killing himself during his inner monologue. That being said, Mel Gibson’s 1990 portrayal of Hamlet in his “to be or not to be” soliloquy was portrayed the best because of the setting, the lack of sounds and his ray of emotions in his body language and, more specifically, in his eyes.
Reply
Lauren E Anderson
12/13/2018 04:38:37 am
(end of essay)
Reply
Mathias Stoecker
12/13/2018 05:40:39 am
I really enjoyed your essay. I think we had a lot of similar ideas and it's nice to see someone else's interpretations of the ideas I had. However, an idea that you had was that he was asking the skeletons about the afterlife. If the skeletons could respond, how do you think they would respond? Would they respond at all?
Reply
Jaedyn Viane
12/12/2018 07:42:17 pm
Reply
Lauryn Moubray
12/13/2018 11:23:52 am
I absolutely love your attention grabber!! You explain what people could interpret from Hamlet's to be or not to be scene, but which one do you side with? Maybe try explaining this a little at the beginning. I agree that his fragmented sentences emphasized his rage, I didn't think of that before! Overall, you have a really great essay with excellent word choice!
Reply
Ashley Guenthardt
12/14/2018 09:42:49 am
Questioning the main question of the soliloquy to begin your post made me excited to keep reading! I love your use of vocabulary words, reference to literary devices, and inclusion of controversy over the scene to grab your readers interest! Early in your post, you mention that Hamlet could be questioning the meaning of life itself, or fearing the unknown after life. Do you think he could also be referring to death so much because of the recent passing (murdering)of his father? I almost feel he seems to have a vengeful threat to his tone of voice as he concludes his speech. I'd also love to hear more about your belief on whether or not Hamlet was aware of Claudius and Polonius's presence behind the mirror! Overall extremely well written and kept me interested throughout the whole piece!
Reply
Hannah Hard
12/12/2018 07:53:12 pm
“ To be or not to be” is one Shakespeare's most famous lines. However there is controversy between Shakespearean scholars on how to interpret Hamlet’s soliloquy. There are many different interpretations from suicide to reflecting on death to denoting murder. One could only wish to ask Shakespeare what his intention was. The best performance of “ To be or not to be” is up to each person’s interpretation of the text. No two renditions are the same. Based upon my personal view, the best rendition of Hamlet’s most famous soliloquy is from the 1990 film, Hamlet, starring Mel Gibson.
Reply
Amalia Flores
12/13/2018 10:50:06 am
I really like how you went in depth with how Hamlet paused due to the emotions and despair he was going through, and how he appeared to reflect on what he's saying. Do you think this reflection sparked his passion for a new purpose? I also enjoyed the quotes you added in to back up the points you made about his thoughts and emotions. Amazing job adding in how this made the audience feel, and be able to understand Hamlet. I really enjoyed this essay, great job!
Reply
Alexis Simpson
12/12/2018 07:54:15 pm
Hamlet is one of the most famous tragedies written by Shakespeare. The well known soliloquy, “To be or not to be”, sparked a debate on its true interpretation, whether it be glorifying suicide or an indirect nod towards Claudius’ murder. This controversial speech has been performed countless times, however, David Tennant’s performance in the 2009 film, Hamlet, proved to be the epitome of Hamlet’s soliloquy.
Reply
Luke
12/13/2018 05:31:43 am
I really enjoyed this essay. I liked how you used the darkness around Hamlet as an effect choice and made it support your argument. However, do you think that the darkness around him could also be symbolism? That the darkness could resemble Hamlet's inner darkness? Or perhaps the corruptness in the kingdom? Overall I really liked the essay. Nice job!
Reply
Riley Hancock
12/13/2018 10:40:33 am
I really loved the perspective you took on this, the line "[...] he worshiped the benefits of death" was beautiful. I am curious why the part where David Tennant was staring directly into the camera wasn't added, I feel like that would've added a whole new layer of depth. I do like the idea that the director left the background dark so you had to focus on Hamlet's despair. He himself was soaking in it for cryin' out loud. One last thing is do you think he was leaning against the wall relaxed? Or was he exhausted from his charade? giving up for just a moment? Overall, very good analysis!
Reply
Alyssa Chestnut
12/14/2018 11:50:40 am
I appreciate your depth of idea here, especially considering it is very different to my interpretation. Your argumentation for the idea of his life being that of a dark, suicidal place is well written. Using such specific examples of textual evidence with a short, but precise comparison to the emotion you believe the actor was exemplifying was an effective strategy.
Reply
Mathias Stoecker
12/14/2018 04:42:08 pm
Nice job! I really enjoyed how you acknowledged that some consider the soliloquy to be a nod towards Claudius’ murder rather than suicide, that’s something I wanted to address but the version I analyzed didn’t really touch on it. I also thought it was nice how you mentioned the director’s name, which shows that you did your research on this version. You talked about how the darkness of the scene made the audience focus on hamlet rather than his surroundings, so what do you think this version would be like if it had a more “flamboyant” setting as you put it?
Reply
Charlie Hazel
12/12/2018 07:56:24 pm
The ingenious tragedy Hamlet houses many remarkable lines and cogent ideas. The most notable is Hamlet’s “To be or not to be” soliloquy, one of a series that delve somewhat uncomfortably into the value of life and the seemingly open option of death. The Kenneth Branaugh rendition of the soliloquy is the best interpretation because of symbolism in setting, embodiment of Hamlet’s circumstances, and textual accuracy.
Reply
Lauren Anderson
12/13/2018 05:40:23 am
The idea that you had of the setting, that he ends up in the center of the place where his grief has originated, is so well worded, and it is an idea that not many would note. You saw everything when you watched this video, nothing went unnoticed, even the little things that seemed insignificant. Your attention to detail is evident throughout you entire essay. Furthermore, your thoughts on the control Hamlet had on his emotions is really well thought out and well explained. I would have never thought that Hamlet's soliloquy could be emotionally controlled, and yet Branaugh was able to keep Hamlet's head on straight. Amazing essay, such great insight.
Reply
The Fernando
12/13/2018 07:39:15 am
Great points there Charles ol boy. Your presentation of your reasoning of why this soliloquy is the superior of the rest are masterly implemented into the essay. Exquisite use of class vocabulary along with other high level diction that elevates your argument to another magnitude. Your argument was concise, but deep and offers credence to your belief that at this moment Hamlet is passionate and collected giving the character of Hamlet even more depth. Overall great essay Charles you ol chap. I leave you with this question, did Hamlet know that his uncle daddy Claudius and Polonius were watching him?
Reply
Casey Klassen
12/14/2018 04:59:44 pm
Interesting essay. I never would have pulled those points out of this interpretation but you did. I like the way you formatted your essay in the standard three body paragraphs that revolve around your main points stated in the thesis. You do put a good spin on the format as I was never annoyed with the your format because of its repetitiveness for a lack of a better word. I enjoyed reading your point on symbolism in the setting as I never realized his examination of the room before he became fixated upon the mirror. I agree with your statement that Hamlet must have many mixed emotions swirling around in his head from his experiences in that great hall. I was surprised with your paragraph on Hamlets “Sea of troubles” as I wouldn't have expected so much power was hidden in those words. Overall I enjoyed reading you essay. You sprinkled in your main all throughout you body paragraphs because you meticulously chose your main points to appear in multiple arguments. I wish your conclusion was longer than just restating your thesis but it is ok. Again great job and I look forward to reading your next paper.
Reply
Alissa Brown
12/12/2018 07:57:45 pm
Numerous actors accept the challenge to portray Hamlet’s iconic “to be or not to be” soliloquy in an innovative way. I believe that Laurence Olivier’s 1948 interpretation of the soliloquy is one of the best portrayals due to effective use of imagery depicting Hamlet’s mental state, his body language to show a shift in emotion, and the symbolism of Hamlet dropping his dagger into the ocean.
Reply
Adriana Sanders
12/13/2018 05:14:16 am
Wow, this is a great essay! Your analysis and word choice is incredible! The strong diction make the essay flow well, and add to the imagery of the film. I also really enjoy how you brought in textual evidence to back up your claim. You related the filmmaker's choices to the original soliloquy, and it ties together beautifully! I like how you talked about the sudden shift in body language, as I also noticed that in the Mel Gibson version. You talked about how Hamlet wishes suicide wasn't a sin, which is an interesting thought. Do you think if suicide wasn't considered a sin, that Hamlet would kill himself? Or would he still feel the need to persevere to avenge his father? Great job! :)
Reply
Kayla Cuatt
12/13/2018 05:28:43 am
Great job!! I really like how you used in-text citations and your analysis of the quotes you used was really in depth; I really liked how you compared the crashing of the waves to Hamlet's mental state and expressing how his focus went from his own death to the revenge of his father. Nice job!
Reply
Luke
12/13/2018 05:42:19 am
Excellent job! Your essay gave me a new appreciation for this version. I like how you connected the scenery to what was happening around it. I did not understand why you started your body paragraph about body language talking about the ocean. Do you like that the ocean impacted Hamlets body language? I honestly did not care for this version, but you convinced me to enjoy it. Wonderfully done!
Reply
Kaleigh Slot
12/12/2018 08:01:26 pm
One Soliloquy, Many Interpretations
Reply
Lauren Pryor
12/14/2018 06:34:18 am
I love how you addressed Hamlet's struggles in the introduction, it immediately allows the reader to relate and sympathize with your point. In the first paragraph where you analyze Branagh's tempo, I agree that the way he delivers his lines conveys Hamlet's collection of his thoughts; he starts out unsure but quickly dives into deeper thought. Do you think Hamlet comes across as suicidal? Or do you think he's just analyzing everything he's been through and trying to process it all?
Reply
Ashley Guenthardt
12/14/2018 09:25:53 am
This is so well written and everything flows perfectly! Your setup of ideas makes it easy for the reader to follow along with the scene and understand the deeper meaning behind the performance. I also choose Branaugh's version of the soliloquy and completely agree with you on his technique behind his use of music for emotion and dramatic effect, and Hamlet's undeniable growth of intensity and emotion towards the end of his speech. When you say the there is indication that Hamlet is also confronting himself when he speaks into the mirror, I wonder if he is trying to encourage himself to put up a strong front against everything he is facing? Great post and amazing analyzation of the scene!
Reply
Alyssa Chestnut
12/12/2018 08:13:31 pm
During Shakespeare’s written time period, it’s crucial to emphasize that after-death was not only unknown, but feared. Furthermore, Hamlet was a production written to expound boundaries, and entertain the amused, though not surpass previously established societal stereotypes. The suspense that attracted the audience was simply Hamlet’s persona granted by Shakespeare--austere anger. Interpreting Hamlet is presently still debated, though Kenneth Branagh’s production of the “To Be or Not To Be” soliloquy best captures and exemplifies Hamlet’s anger by using a sword, a mirror, and a whispering, yet piercing tone, proving argumentation to the interpretation of Hamlet’s angry persona.
Reply
Austin Morofsky
12/13/2018 05:19:59 am
I really enjoyed reading this essay; it's well done and very intelligent. Something I noticed about Branagh's portrayal was his angry tone and it seems unique to his performance. I think you analyzed his tone very well and you actually made me question my choice of Mel Gibson and his more confused, depressing tone. The differences between the two portrayals are very strong which makes for a more interesting debate: is the soliloquy about anger or depression? You made a very solid case and I really enjoyed reading this.
Reply
Alexis Simpson
12/14/2018 10:39:58 am
Your interpretation of Hamlet’s soliloquy was well done, you did such an outstanding job expressing it. Though my interpretation differs, after reading your essay, I can’t help but think “Maybe the beginning of his soliloquy was his exhaustion stemming from his anger, he feels so angry and conflicted with decisions that he grew tired of thinking, so he began glorifying the thought of suicide and the escape it offers from mortal struggles. But, after realizing the fearful unknown, maybe he uses that fear and began thinking of taking Claudius’ life instead of his. After all, if there is a negative effect from the afterlife, why not let Claudius suffer the consequences?” Do you think that’s a possibility? Anyways, great job, Alyssa! I really enjoyed your essay!
Reply
Lamont Aldridge
12/12/2018 08:14:56 pm
Hamlet's iconic “To be or not to be” soliloquy has been reimagined and performed in several different creative ways. Olivier’s depiction of the scene is best, however, because of his use of symbolic imagery, music, and body language.
Reply
Kaleigh Slot
12/13/2018 10:31:58 am
This is really nice! I love the integration of the quotes! They help to propel your thoughts and your analysis. The topic of body language is something new and it does provide an argument to this version being the best. The language you used to describe the actor's actions helps the reader know exactly what you mean and makes the essay overall really easy to read and understand! Great job!
Reply
Jayden Mann
12/13/2018 10:44:58 am
As I was reading this analysis it made me realize that this interpretation of the soliloquy was also very powerful. The way you gave us quotes and then tore them apart made me really understand the portrayal more. The vocab you used also made this analysis more interesting. The way you talked about the dagger and then used then used pierce when saying "This is symbolic and sets this interpretation apart from the rest because the dagger represents all of the horrible thoughts that pierce his mind, or in this case the sea when he drops his “bare bodkin"." was really cool to me. Overall i like the way you thought of things, it made me think differently of this interpretation.
Reply
Riley Hancock
12/13/2018 10:49:53 am
Wow, so the idea of the sea being his mind (shown in the movie obviously) and the dagger is his dark thoughts that pierce his mind is a very profound analysis. I hadn't thought of it that way before, I took it as his giving up on the idea of killing himself out of fear of the afterlife. The only thing I think you could add is a more comprehensive description of the sea becoming his mind but that's just me being knit-picky.
Reply
Chloe Beutler
12/13/2018 11:21:29 am
This brought me back to the video performance as it is well structured. It is possible that added conclusion of thematic elements relating to their purpose would really top this off. However, you gave many great examples! I enjoyed the outside connection you made to dreams because so many readers can relate to this!
Reply
Sophie Lupini
12/12/2018 08:32:07 pm
Paralleled Thought
Reply
Lauren Crossman
12/13/2018 05:35:12 am
It was interesting to read how you brought up the idea of death or loss of existence; I had not thought about this angle of Hamlet's spirit dying, not physically dying. When Hamlet sprawls himself on one specific tomb, do you think he feels more suicidal or a loss of his existence? I felt that he was trying to be one with death, that he longed to be resting in a tomb alongside them.
Reply
Neva M Clarke
12/13/2018 04:36:31 am
The soliloquy in Shakespeare’s play Hamlet, “to be or not to be,” is one of the most well known and famous works he’s written. This famous soliloquy has been portrayed and interpreted by many actors in plays and films: Mel Gibson depicted Hamlet’s thoughts in a 1990 film using stupendous setting techniques and in depth communication through body language. Mel Gibson’s portrayal exceeds the other interpretations with his exuberant methods and techniques.
Reply
Kaleigh Slot
12/13/2018 10:37:34 am
This essay does a really good job with bringing in new and underlying ideas. The idea of Hamlet committing suicide and the evidence used makes the argument of how this actor does the best performance of Hamlet. The new ideas make the essay more enjoyable and intriguing. I also enjoyed how your diction made the essay easy to read and comprehend. I could tell exactly what you meant and you painted a picture in my head, making me change my argument to that Gibson did do the best performance. Great job!
Reply
Amalia Flores
12/13/2018 11:45:06 am
Reply
Briana Holliday
12/13/2018 08:27:41 pm
I love the opener and you do a wonderful job smoothly connecting it to your thesis, which is just as strong. Nice vocab too! In your intro to your 1st body paragraph, you talk of people interpreting his speech as suicidal; the wording is just a bit wonky so maybe say instead, "some readers believe that Hamlet is debating suicide due to the depressing tone he takes when delivers his colliding thoughts." Same in the next sentence, " by alluding to the madness they view in his voice", just change "view" to "hear". Get rid of "line" when you say "deceased family line", it sounds redundant. Love the use of lighting! That's something different not a lit of others talked about.
Reply
Ashley Guenthardt
12/13/2018 10:56:08 am
Kenneth Branaugh’s 1996 interpretation of Hamlet’s famous “To be or not to be” soliloquy best portrays the feelings of Hamlet during his speech by including a rather dreary background music to set the mood and giving Hamlet a whisper tone as he speaks his pain filled cry for help. As the scene continues, Hamlet’s voice changes and he seems to bear more of a threat, and there has been controversy that Hamlet is aware of Claudius and Polonius lurking behind the mirror that he seems to be preaching to. This remake of the soliloquy also best represents Hamlet’s grief and emotions from his recent father’s passing, seemingly challenging all of the struggles he has been facing lately.
Reply
Alissa Brown
12/14/2018 07:09:32 pm
Ashley, I like that in your essay you mentioned Hamlet's change in tone during his soliloquy. A few other interpretations also used a tone shift in order to show a switching mindset part way through the speech. However, I find this interpretation interesting because, as you mentioned, his tone becomes more threatening. Personally, I believe that Hamlet knew that Claudius and Polonius lurked behind the two way mirror due to his threatening manner. Do you think that Hamlet would have acted differently if he knew that Claudius and Polonius were listening as opposed to if he was unaware of their presence?
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ArchivesCategories |